２０００年製ＳＡＴＵＲＮ ＳＷ２と １９９９年製ＳＡＴＵＲＮ ＳＣ２の比較
１，ＳＷ２は５ナンバー、ＳＣ２は車幅広いので３ナンバー。
２．ＳＣ２は少し車重あるせいか？エンジン同じなのにＳＣ２は加速が重い？しかし高速なとでスピードに乗ると安定感が強い。ＳＣ２のが最高速度高いが、日本の高速じゃあＳＷ２のが楽しいだろう。
３．ＳＣ２ハンドリングは秀逸。コーナーの切れ味がよいので、かえって町乗りが楽しい。ＳＷ２はＳＣ２に比べてバタバタする。といっても、SW2が３リッター以上のミニバンに直線で抜かされてもワインデイングで楽々追い抜けることは１４．悪路走行にも書いた。
４．ＳＣ２のサスは堅い。特に後席ではなれないと気分が悪くなる。ＳＣ２の後部座席は座面が短く、背中が直立しているので長距離乗るのは苦しいだろう。足下は広いが・・。まあＶＷコラードよりはかなり広いけど。ＳＷ２のサスは少し柔らかい。高速でもっと柔らかくなる変な感じ。
５．ＳＣ２の前席の乗り心地はよい。堅めのレカロシートでカーブでも固定されている。ＳＷ２のシートは柔らかい。ペラッとしているが長時間運転しても疲れない変な感じ。
６．１９９９年製ＳＣ２はマイナーチェンジ前なので音がうるさい。特にエアコンつけた時。
７ １９９９年モデルは内装がキャバリエやカマロにそっくりだ。とくにハンドル。ハンドルは１９９９年モデルのが２０００年モデルより少し大きい。パネルボタン類は２０００年のが大きく使いやすいと思う。クラクションは断然１９９９年のが使いやすい（２０００年のはエアバックと一体化し容易に鳴らない）。室内の質感はなぜか１９９９年製ＳＣ２がよい気がした（スイッチ類がゴチャゴチャしてるからか？）。まとめると、１９９９年モデルはアメ車ぽくて豪華だが飽きがきそう。２０００年モデルはトヨタ車ぽい。
８．なぜかＳＷ２の変速ショック大きい。特にキックバックがおおきい。ＳＣ２はほとんど感じなかった。
９．走った感じの印象は意外とＳＣ２はドイツ車、特に以前に乗ったＢＭＷ５に近い印象を受けた。ＳＷ２はトヨタの小型ターボ車に近い感じ。
１０．クーラーは２０００年ＳＷ２のが断然よく効く。２０００年になって改良されたのか？１９９９年ＳＣ２のダイナモがへたっていたのか？ＳＣ２は上から見ると三分の二がウインドウだからか？ＵＶカットがはいってないのか？
よく聞かれる決定的な違い
１．１９９９年製のは車の底でシャカシャカシャカと音がする。これは乗り始め１回だけ。恵比寿（ＡＢＳ）さんが車を守ってくれている（点検）音らしい。
２．２０００年からはＡＢＳとＴＲＣは４輪独立。ｱｳﾃﾞｲの４ＷＤみたい！１９９９年までは前輪と後輪が独立。
３．後席ヘッドレスト（荷物を大量に載せた時便利。それ以外は後ろが見づらい。）、及びイモ付きキーレスが２０００年モデルから追加。それから、よく聞かれるのは外車はセンターパネルにギア表示がないです。
2000make SATURN SW2 Comparison of 1999make SATURN SC2
1.SW2 is five numbers .Since SC2 it is broad, they are three numbers
2.Is SC2 because it is somewhat heavy? Although it is the same engine, SC2 has strong sense of stability, when acceleration rides that it is few, however is high-speed on speed. SC2's -- top speed -- although it is high, probably, SW2's will be pleasant on a highway of Japan
3.SC2 handling is wonderful. Since the sharpness of a corner is good, town riding is pleasant on the contrary. SW2 shakes at a corner compared with SC2. But even if SW2 was omitted in a straight line by the minivan 3l. or more, that it can pass easily at a corner wrote also to 14. bad road run.
4.The suspension of SC2 is hard. Feeling becomes bad as if it does not especially get used in a backseat. The backseat of SC2 has short width, and probably, it will be painful to carry out long-distance operation since the back stands straight. Although a step is large .. Although it is quite larger than VW KORADO well. sasupention of SW2 is somewhat soft. Strange touch which becomes softer at high speed.
5.It is [ of the front seat of SC2 ] comfortable to ride in. The body is being fixed also for the curve with the harder REKARO sheet. The sheet of SW2 is soft. Strange touch which does not get tired even if it operates for a long time, although it is thin.
6.Since 1999make SC2 is before a minor change, its sound is noisy. It is annoying when especially an air-conditioner is turned on.
7.As for the 1999 model, interior is just like that of Cavalier or KAMARO. It is especially a handle. The 1999 model's of a handle is somewhat larger than the 2000 model. Panel switches think that they are easy to use 2000's greatly. 1999's tend (2000, it unites with the air back and will not sound easily) to use a horn positively. I felt that why or product SC2 made from 1999 was good for indoor textures (is it because switches are complicated?). If it collects, although the model is gorgeous at the appearance which is an American vehicle, wethe ariness is likely to come in 1999. The 2000 model is the appearance which is the Toyota vehicle.
8.in-variable-speed shock of SW2 -- I feel that it is large Especially a kickback is large. SC2 was not felt almost.
9.SC2 received the impression near BMW5 on which it rode that the impression of the touch which ran was unexpected the German vehicle, especially before. SW2 is touch near the small turboengine car of Toyota.
10.Make SW2's is good positively and an air conditioner will be effective in 2000. it was become and improved in 2000 -- the dynamo of make SC2 had weakened in ? 1999 SC2 is because 2/3 is a window when it sees from a top isn't the UV cut contained?